Hot News: Triple Jangro Implications… (Updated)

Well, I guess it’s time I posted some feedback on my own blog about the “Triple Jangro” issues that David Lewis has raised.

I’ve been following this story very closely and the discussions in many other circles are as follows (not my views, simply what people are saying):

1. Many Search Engine employees & Affiliate Networks are already using their own data from affiliates and other merchants to go to networks and buy traffic, based on inside information they receive from clients. This pushes up the click prices on the search engine’s side, and increases the competition and prices for an advertiser, so in theory, as their employees from both networks and search engines are using confidential data to find niches and extract profits, and in both cases, increase profits of the search engines and the networks.

2. Data Privacy has potentially been infringed by the networks and the search engines, this can result in a class action to many affiliate networks and search engines and there is already talk afoot about this. In many cases, this speculation is unwarranted and spurious, but there have been many spurious class action suits in the past – so let’s assume that a case can be brought before a court.

My views:

While I don’t think that the Triple Jangro was an isolated case, I do feel that a class action suit would damage the industry’s reputation – both affiliate and search, and I strongly urge those who are considering this course of action, to back down and just roll with the punches, this time.

I do think that as part of a bigger strategy, the super affiliates (which represent the largest chunk of affiliate commissions), networks and search engines should have a round table meeting to discuss the way forward, and myself and a few others are already willing to start these discussions. In theory, if a class action suit had to go forward, the super affiliates stand to gain the most from a settlement, if they’re the ones saying “let’s not”, I’m hoping that people will listen. This is not a viable course of action and will only lead to more volatility in our industry.

In my mind it’s very clear, both search engines and affiliate networks should enforce both data privacy and non-competes with their staff with respect to all their clients. Problem solved – everyone is happy. Going the Class Action route will only be damaging to the industry and create unnecessary long term distractions in our core businesses, and that being, building a sustainable and long term industry for all of to enjoy the fruits of.

I don’t think that the companies in many cases even knew what their employees have been up to, so that’s at least a relief – that they have not been openly advocating this breach of privacy and if they enforce a code of conduct upon their employees, at the very least, this is an indicator of good faith upon them. People tend to be entrepreunerial and opportunistic, and you cannot fault anyone for that – it’s human nature.

This is really a part of the growing pains of any industry, and we just need to ensure that we deal with the situation in a positive manner.

Please feel free to post comments on this blog – as it will be followed closely.

Some other coverage of this topic:

Adam Viener
Revenue Magazine

Att: US Government Re: Google Subpoena

For those of you who aren’t following the recent happenings with Google and the US Government, visit Search Engine Watch’s blog.

For those of you who are, how about this for a novel idea:

If Google refuses the serve the subpoena, obviously fighting them is one option, but the other is simply to subpoena the ISP’s. It is a well known fact that ISP’s have almost exactly the same data that Google receives in it’s query boxes (as they transmit the data), and by serving a subpoena for this data to AOL, Earthlink, etc, the US Government could easily obtain the information that they’re requesting, unless they want more than just the searches…

But then again, I’m just a lonely blogger in the South Africa, what do I know?

An offline advertising marketplace? Powered by eBay!

I found this article to be a very interesting. It’s not as if this move was unforseable, but the reality is that the big media giants are waking up to the efficiencies that online auctions provide, and that which is driving Google’s growth.

I think a strong point for eBay in this article, is the acquisition of Skype and the potential Pay Per Call offerings that Skype will be releasing soon, combined with offline media.

Google Adword Editor Released

One of the downsides of having high level Beta access to the latest products and tools from the major search engines, is that it’s all under NDA and I can never write anything about it, until it’s officially published by someone else :-) .

We’ve been one of the lucky few companies to be able to test out the Google Adwords Editor for the past few weeks, before it was publicly announced by Greg today.

It’s a very handy free tool for managing your Google accounts and will probably wind up putting some other similar software developers out of business. The product is very rudimentary at this stage, but it will probably beat most products by end of this year, and I can imagine some advanced features being added.

Affiliate Summit

I just got back from the affiliate summit, and it was a great trip. I’m still jet lagged. I was unable to provide live commentary, due to the fact that there was no wireless Internet at the conference. I took alot of notes, and I’ll post them this week.

What better way to start my New Year’s blog off with Google’s latest $bn acquisition (or rather, potential $bn, based on earn out). Andy Beal reports on it.

It’s quite clear that Google intends on doing the following:

Aggregating media such as Radio & Television and providing it via the Internet (over IP), and then using it’s Adwords system, or a derivative thereof, to auction adverts to certain demographics watching or listening to the content provided. This is the future of marketing…