
Brad Garlinghouse, a Senior Vice-President at Yahoo, had his internal memo published on the Wall Street Journal yesterday. This memo effectively admits defeat in the short term, and explains what Yahoo has to do in order to get it’s house in order, from Garlinghouse’s position. Here is a quick overview (read the WSJ article for a more detailed explanation).
Recognizing Our Problems
We lack a focused, cohesive vision for our company. We want to do everything and be everything — to everyone. We’ve known this for years, talk about it incessantly, but do nothing to fundamentally address it. We are scared to be left out. We are reactive instead of charting an unwavering course. We are separated into silos that far too frequently don’t talk to each other. And when we do talk, it isn’t to collaborate on a clearly focused strategy, but rather to argue and fight about ownership, strategies and tactics.
Our inclination and proclivity to repeatedly hire leaders from outside the company results in disparate visions of what winning looks like — rather than a leadership team rallying around a single cohesive strategy.
I’ve heard our strategy described as spreading peanut butter across the myriad opportunities that continue to evolve in the online world. The result: a thin layer of investment spread across everything we do and thus we focus on nothing in particular.
I hate peanut butter. We all should.
We lack clarity of ownership and accountability.
We lack decisiveness.
We end up with competing (or redundant) initiatives and synergistic opportunities living in the different silos of our company.
• YME vs. Musicmatch • Flickr vs. Photos • YMG video vs. Search video • Deli.cio.us vs. myweb • Messenger and plug-ins vs. Sidebar and widgets • Social media vs. 360 and Groups • Front page vs. YMG • Global strategy from BU’vs. Global strategy from Int’lThe Solution:
1. Focus the vision
2. Restore accountability and clarity of ownership
3. Execute a radical reorganization
4. Blow up the matrix.
5. Kill the redundancies.
Jeremy Zawodny, another Yahoo veteran, offers a slightly different view. He agrees and disagrees at the same time, as posted on his blog.
I think, all things considered, that Brad is probably quite right - the overlaps and inefficiencies around having multiple products serving the same markets is shocking, to say the least. Yahoo should look to acquire the right companies, sell off the wrong divisions, and focus on building out what I think is already a fantastic platform business - and not just competing with Google on search, but also by leveraging what Jeremy Z and his team have done over at the API side of Yahoo. This is the future of the Semantic Web - we know, because we’re in the thick of it with Synthasite, a product that is arguably ahead of it’s time.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!





Comments On This Post
November 21, 2006 at 3:36 pm
Vinny,
Thanks so much for the spotlight on the leaked memo.
You provided a fascinating read.
The major lesson for everyone to be learned is “don’t spread yourself out too thin.”
Thanks, Vinny, for providing the cuttting edge!
Rhianna
November 21, 2006 at 5:36 pm
Vinny,
Thanks so much for the spotlight on the leaked memo.
You provided a fascinating read.
The major lesson for everyone to be learned is “don’t spread yourself out too thin.”
Thanks, Vinny, for providing the cuttting edge!
Rhianna
November 22, 2006 at 8:05 am
Good read. I feel sorry for Yahoo though, they could’ve been great, but it’s just as he said, they didn’t manage growth very well.
November 22, 2006 at 10:05 am
Good read. I feel sorry for Yahoo though, they could’ve been great, but it’s just as he said, they didn’t manage growth very well.
November 23, 2006 at 3:54 pm
I really believe Yahoo have the potential to improve dramatically if they can choose the right area(s) to focus on. The area(s), though, doesn’t necessarily have to be identical to Google’s.
November 23, 2006 at 5:54 pm
I really believe Yahoo have the potential to improve dramatically if they can choose the right area(s) to focus on. The area(s), though, doesn’t necessarily have to be identical to Google’s.
November 23, 2006 at 10:05 pm
You said it Gordon, they need to find their own path and stop trying to be Google.
November 24, 2006 at 12:05 am
You said it Gordon, they need to find their own path and stop trying to be Google.
December 4, 2006 at 1:44 am
Vinny - the news here is more about the memo, both on its face and as part of a corporate trend of leaking/airing dirty laundry, and the internal power struggles (vis a vis Semel probably) *rather than* much of the substance of what Yahoo! has been doing with multiple, disjointed initiatives. Yahoo! has had that issue for the last 5 years — it’s not really that new. It’s always surprised me how un-self conscious they’ve been about that. The other interesting thing to think about in this context is how Yahoo! DNA is spreading across the industry, many people have left and continue to do so, and certain interesting situations result (e.g. the YouTube-Google lawsuit-avoidance settlements you may have heard about).
December 4, 2006 at 3:44 am
Vinny - the news here is more about the memo, both on its face and as part of a corporate trend of leaking/airing dirty laundry, and the internal power struggles (vis a vis Semel probably) *rather than* much of the substance of what Yahoo! has been doing with multiple, disjointed initiatives. Yahoo! has had that issue for the last 5 years — it’s not really that new. It’s always surprised me how un-self conscious they’ve been about that. The other interesting thing to think about in this context is how Yahoo! DNA is spreading across the industry, many people have left and continue to do so, and certain interesting situations result (e.g. the YouTube-Google lawsuit-avoidance settlements you may have heard about).
May 16, 2007 at 8:38 pm
[...] I think Yahoo finally gets it! The Peanut Butter Manifesto has sunk in and they’re rationalizing their business in order to create depth of product [...]
Join the Dicussion