<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ingenio Pay Per Call Patent Information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vinnylingham.com/ingenio-pay-per-call-patent-information.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vinnylingham.com/ingenio-pay-per-call-patent-information.html</link>
	<description>Entrepreneur, Blogger, Speaker, Webaholic &#38; Search Engine Guru</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conspiracy Theory - AT&#38;T Acquires Ingenio to Fight Google &#187; SEOpittfall</title>
		<link>http://www.vinnylingham.com/ingenio-pay-per-call-patent-information.html/comment-page-1#comment-132810</link>
		<dc:creator>Conspiracy Theory - AT&#38;T Acquires Ingenio to Fight Google &#187; SEOpittfall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.vinnylingham.com/?p=109#comment-132810</guid>
		<description>[...] suspect this move is more sinister than it looks. I wrote a post on my personal blog a while back, detailing Ingenio’s Pay Per Call patents. If AT&#38;T decided to use their legal muscle to enforce the patents, Google may be in for some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suspect this move is more sinister than it looks. I wrote a post on my personal blog a while back, detailing Ingenio’s Pay Per Call patents. If AT&#38;T decided to use their legal muscle to enforce the patents, Google may be in for some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Conspiracy Theory - AT&#38;T Acquires Ingenio to Fight Google &#187; SEOpittfall &#187; Archive - Search Engine Optimization by pittfall!</title>
		<link>http://www.vinnylingham.com/ingenio-pay-per-call-patent-information.html/comment-page-1#comment-85999</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Conspiracy Theory - AT&#38;T Acquires Ingenio to Fight Google &#187; SEOpittfall &#187; Archive - Search Engine Optimization by pittfall!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.vinnylingham.com/?p=109#comment-85999</guid>
		<description>[...] suspect this move is more sinister than it looks. I wrote a post on my personal blog a while back, detailing Ingenio’s Pay Per Call patents. If AT&#38;T decided to use their legal muscle to enforce the patents, Google may be in for some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suspect this move is more sinister than it looks. I wrote a post on my personal blog a while back, detailing Ingenio’s Pay Per Call patents. If AT&#38;T decided to use their legal muscle to enforce the patents, Google may be in for some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sinister Reason Why AT&#38;T Acquired Ingenio</title>
		<link>http://www.vinnylingham.com/ingenio-pay-per-call-patent-information.html/comment-page-1#comment-85702</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sinister Reason Why AT&#38;T Acquired Ingenio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.vinnylingham.com/?p=109#comment-85702</guid>
		<description>[...] move is more sinister than it looks. I wrote a post on my personal blog a while back, detailing Ingenio&#8217;s Pay Per Call patents. If AT&#38;T decided to use their legal muscle to enforce the patents, Google may be in for some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] move is more sinister than it looks. I wrote a post on my personal blog a while back, detailing Ingenio&#8217;s Pay Per Call patents. If AT&#38;T decided to use their legal muscle to enforce the patents, Google may be in for some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
