Special Report : Profit Sharing - The Performance Marketing Model of the Future

Special Report : Profit Sharing - The Performance Marketing Model of the Future

Andreas Reiffen, who recently joined the Clicks2Customers team in Cape Town, and who hails from Germany, has done some very interesting research in the field of Performance Marketing, something that I have been a huge advocate of. It’s been the founding belief of Clicks2Customers that search marketing can only exist in a performance metric driven environment and that we see ourselves as an extension of the merchant themselves, as we invest in people, technology and infrastructure, and then leverage that investment across multiple clients on a pure risk basis. The amount of money we spend on R&D around search is not easily covered by all but the largest of merchants. By leveraging this cost across multiple clients, we are able to deliver a superior service, at cost incidental to the revenues.
Those in the know will agree that Search Marketing is infinitely more complex than what 99% of search marketers will agree to - and often this is just to massage their already fragile egos as this industry advances and becomes too complex for them. In most cases it’s their own ignorance which does not allow them to see the true complexities of the situation, and instead, rely on common thinking to solve complex problems around search, to the detriment of their clients. For example, the typical agency will tell the client how they manage keyword bidding effectively over thousands of keywords - keyword bidding is NOT search marketing.

To this end, we have established that the best way for a service provider and a merchant to co-exist is in the performance marketing space, where profit share is ultimately the goal, but an interim measure like revenue share can be a good proxy for profit share, if structured correctly.

When I speak to all but the most sophisticated of search marketers, including merchants themselves, the single biggest issue is that CMO’s, Marketing Managers & others within an organisation do not understand the channel, worry themselves with things like Brand bidding & display URL’s, when in actual fact, they have no real understanding on the impact of decisions made regarding these, but they think they do. And if these are their biggest issues, then they’re doomed to mediocrity in the search world. This reality is that search marketing is in it’s infancy, and during this period of time, education is very important. We’re trying to push the envelope and build the industry by releasing research like the cookie report that we released last month, as well as the profit sharing report mentioned in this post.
Profit shares bring along its own levels of complexity (which is detailed in the report), but suffice it to say that search marketing models with fees based on a either % of spend, hours or fixed fees are becoming as ancient as the Dodo.

Andreas has done a remarkable job of putting together fact, assumption and raw data to establish the argument as to why performance marketing works. Traditional & New Media agencies that offer paid search marketing services are on the backfoot with regard to search, as their metrics are not in line with the search engines themselves and their performance is not linked with their remuneration. I have been to many meetings where all I hear are complaints about their search providers, but they won’t change them, due to fear that the new provider might do even worse. It’s a sorry state of affairs. Often the agency has such a grip on the client due to the fact that they handle more than just search, the opportunity to expand the search side of the business is neglected. This is where affiliates & performance marketers often perform the best, which leads to even more insecurity from the agency standpoint.
What makes our business unique is our relentless belief that satisfying the search end user is of paramount importance and all other metrics will eventually revolve around this. This is the reason why we advocate performance based search marketing as a channel within search marketing. Search engines are platforms for marketing to end users and satisfying the needs of searchers - you still need a partner that is focused on understanding what the user wants, how each engine attempts to satisfy their users, and how to align the merchant’s interests with them. Focusing on the searcher will make any Search Engine Marketers (SEM) successful. Google have done a remarkable job of keeping their eye on this goal, and given their success, it would be a good idea to take a lesson out of their book.

I highly recommend that you read the Clicks2Customers Profit Sharing report!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Viewing 8 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Hi Vinny,

    thanks for your comment at my blog at ReveNews. Very good post regarding the problem. I wrote actually a series of posts related to the issue.

    I addressed several of the ulcers that grew in this industry creating problems for merchants and affiliates in the various marketing channels.that shouldn't be there.

    I don't like the phrase Affiliate Marketing either. The meaning in the offline world is quite different than online . How did Beth Kirsch put it so nicely (repeated in my own words): A lot of smart people in the internet marketing industry are not getting it, what affiliate marketing is really about and how it works.

    A lot of issues are caused by dangerous "half/incomplete" knowledge or complete misunderstanding of the matter altogether (without realizing or admitting it).

    I agree that Performance Marketing is the better term. It is for years the "tag line" for Affiliate Marketing already so lets make the tag line to the headline ;)

    Affiliate, excuse me, Performance Marketing works only well and long term, if a strong relationship between Advertiser and Publisher was established which gets continuously reinforced and strengthened.
    A relationship that is profitable and beneficial for both parties alike and not just one-sided. Clear defined goals that are openly addressed and discussed between affiliate and advertiser is important and the establishment of trust is absolutely vital.

    Everything else is predatorily business practice or competitive marketing, which brings two parties together that are actually enemies, only to fight a mutual (and bigger) enemy of both of them.

    This does not make them friends. Both sides are secretly waiting and preparing for the day that the mutual enemy is defeated in the hope to be able to then turn around to the previous "partner" to slaughter him in cold blood, while he is the least expecting it.

    Well, the one thing we can do about this issue is educating the one that want to be educated and to seek open dialog and discussion like done here via Blogging about it and not leaving things sitting and rotting in the back of the closet until it becomes a problem that is not solvable anymore.

    Cheers,
    • ^
    • v
    Hi Vinny,

    interesting thoughts, this is something i have been waiting to come up for some time already. However, i still miss that you credit more than one marketing partner (the one with the last click) with a profit share. Only this will ultimately show the tail's real weight. Andreas (and other german speakers) might want to read a discussion (in german) i tried to bring up about this issue some while ago:
    https://www.openbc.com/cgi-bin/forum.fpl?op=sho...

    Would bei interesting to know if somebody shares any of these ideas.

    Cheers, Ralf
    • ^
    • v
    Hey Vinny. I guess my long comment to this post ended up in the trash bin. I have my comment saved on my computer in the case it got lost. :Let me know and I will repost it. Thanks.
    • ^
    • v
    Hi Vinny,

    Really good thoughts indeed, but reading it my belief is that search marketing as you describe it is reserved only for big corporates with large budgets. So if you were asked to quantify the necessary investment budget for SMEs, what would be your estimatation about?

    Jean-Marie
    • ^
    • v
    Sorry about that Carsten - my comment spam filter caught it - it's been released, above. Thanks.
    • ^
    • v
    Don't get me wrong, managing a small keyword set for an average SME (10,000 keyword +-) is easily achieved by using the Google interface, and will most likely be about 80% efficient if there is at least 1 person dedicated to the campaign. The issue is managing hundreds of thousands of keywords. Also, if a merchant sells more than 1000 items, it no longer becomes feasible to have only 1 person in-house. We find that our best campaigns are ones where the merchants have either under-resourced their paid search team, or allocated to an agency that does not have enough people or their own technology to manage the load. That's where performance marketing becomes supplemental..
    • ^
    • v
    Vinny,

    Your endorsement (i.e. you wrote: "I have been a huge advocate of ...") as "an extension of the merchant themselves ..." is in contrast to Carsten Cumbrowski's Affiliates are not an extended Sales Force
    Both opinions are interesting and worthy of consideration.
    I believe that Affiliates whether part of a larger, organized group, or whether independent thrive on an independent freedom that could not exist if the Affiliates were an extension of a merchant's sales force. Being an extension of a merchant's sales force also implies exclusivity but one Affiliate may promote and market a merchant and that merchant's competition. As an independent (small) marketer through the websites I create and maintain, I like to sell "gizmos" and as long as I sell a "gizmo" from one of my sites, it doesn't matter to me what merchant is selling the "gizmo" as long as I get the commission. There are times when I will put two links for a certain item or 2 links for separate but similar items on the same web page -- it doesn't really matter to me whether Merchant A makes the ultimate sale or Merchant B unless one of those merchants has a track record for paying me more (in that case, I usually focus my energy on the merchant who pays more).

    In terms of Clicks2Customers search marketing, would your company really wish to be an "extension of the merchant themselves" to the extent that the merchant has control over your company? Do you see your company as a Franchise of the Merchant exisitng underneath a Merchant's umbrella? Probably not, but I wonder how eager Merchants will be to engage in a contract of profit sharing when they are used to paying a stated fee/commission?

    I enjoyed reading all the comments & the links embedded in the comments!
    Andreas Reiffen produced a fine study :-)
    • ^
    • v
    Thanks for post. It is an interesting thought that search marketing can only exist in a performance metric driven environment and that we see ourselves as an extension of the merchant themselves, as we invest in people, technology and infrastructure, and then leverage that investment across multiple clients on a pure risk basis.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

Vinny Lingham is an International Award winning Entrepreneur & Search Engine Marketer. He is currently CEO of Synthasite, a Web 2.0 Startup.

Learn more about Vinny »
RSS Feed

Visit the RSS page to add my feed using your favorite feed reader or subscribe using your email below:

Powered by FeedBlitz
Recent Categories Archives
View All » View All »
General October 2008
Media Coverage September 2008
Synthasite August 2008
Web 2.0 July 2008
Conferences June 2008
Startups May 2008
Featured April 2008
Blogging March 2008
Search Engine Marketing February 2008
Internet Strategy January 2008